\n<\/p>\n
If you\u2019re going to mask them for monkeypox, you might as well mask them permanently. There\u2019s a vastly greater risk, after all, that they\u2019ll be exposed to COVID or the flu at school than that they\u2019ll make contact with a virus that\u2019s essentially (although not entirely) become an STD.<\/p>\n
Technically speaking, masks are probably more effective at preventing monkeypox than they are at preventing COVID. The coronavirus floats in tiny aerosolized droplets that can pass through simple masks. The monkeypox virus lives only in larger respiratory droplets. If your mouth and nose are covered, those larger droplets aren\u2019t getting through.<\/p>\n
You want to guess how many kids across the entirety of the U.S. have contracted monkeypox, though, presumably from being in close quarters with an infected adult relative? Three<\/a>, at last check. And since the virus seems to spread mostly through physical contact with an infected person\u2019s pustules \u2014 or bodily fluids<\/a> \u2014 your kid\u2019s mask won\u2019t save him if he\u2019s playing tag or whatever at school and ends up accidentally touching a sick friend\u2019s sores. A day-care worker in Illinois tested positive a few weeks ago and no one around him, including any of the children, got sick.<\/p>\n Aren\u2019t those sores incredibly painful, by the way? What are the odds that any parent is sending a child to school when he has a rash that\u2019s so sensitive that he cries out in agony when it\u2019s touched?<\/p>\n I missed this NYT story<\/a> last week but Josh Barro<\/a> flagged it on Twitter. The piece is broadly accurate, emphasizing that the virus is currently spreading almost exclusively among gay men, that it\u2019s \u201cextraordinarily rare\u201d among kids, that \u201cindirect contact and environmental contamination is not a major source of transmission,\u201d and that children are more likely to catch it at home than at school. And yet, somehow this deep thought made it in there:<\/p>\n Parents who are concerned about the virus may also be relieved to know that many pandemic precautions and behaviors can be repurposed to protect children against monkeypox: wearing masks in crowded indoor areas<\/strong>, avoiding sharing personal use items, increasing the frequency of hand washing and isolating at home when you\u2019re sick.<\/p>\n It\u2019s important to pay attention to new rashes and other symptoms, Dr. Kalu said. \u201cGet your child assessed by a doctor if the rash starts spreading or is something you\u2019ve not really seen on your child before.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n A random kid\u2019s odds of contracting monkeypox must be extremely small, the odds of contracting it at school<\/a> smaller still, and the odds of contracting it at school in such a way that infection wouldn\u2019t have occurred if they were masked up downright minuscule. Journalist Benjamin Ryan rolled his eyes at the Times\u2019s suggestion about masking and added some context:<\/p>\n There is NO evidence of #monkeypox<\/a> transmission in schools anywhere around the world.https:\/\/t.co\/oLx3iNHle7<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/OZ9sO1sQ1s<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Benjamin Ryan (@benryanwriter) August 21, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n There are obvious strategies to limit the spread of monkeypox and none of them involve masking, for cripes sake. Step one: Be clear that gay men are at special risk<\/a> so that they can take precautions against it and so that everyone else can chill out a little before they decide to make five-year-olds wear N95s. Step two: Make the vaccine as widely available as possible and prioritize gay men for vaccination. Step three: Postpone the orgy that\u2019s scheduled after the local Pride event until next year, after all the participants have been vaccinated. Ryan gently admonished gay readers to do that<\/a> in a piece he published recently. Sex columnist Dan Savage did the same. Some gay\/bi men are listening<\/a>:<\/p>\n A few weeks ago, Zachary Zane, a sex and relationships writer who runs a Brooklyn-based sex party called BISLUT for bisexual men and \u201ctheir admirers,\u201d began considering shutting his events down. In July, Zane stopped attending other sex parties out of fear of the virus. He thought BISLUT might be a particularly risky party because it caters to bisexual men, who are at higher risk for monkeypox than straight men; it also brings these men together with women who are not in the high-risk group. The party could be a \u201cbridge\u201d between these communities, he surmised. So he canceled the party.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Despite the best efforts of public health officials to confuse the public about how the virus is spreading by focusing on how it might spread, the message seems to finally be getting through. Ryan points to these encouraging numbers:<\/p>\n BREAKING: @CDCgov<\/a> reports, based August 5-15 survey with with 787 gay and bisexual men, that to prevent #monkeypox<\/a>: \u2014 Benjamin Ryan (@benryanwriter) August 22, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n There is evidence that sexual behavior change, perhaps complementing widespread vaccination, is contributing to the flatting of the #monkeypox<\/a> curve, and perhaps even a reduction in the rate of new cases, in New York City. pic.twitter.com\/Y6e6j0xFHI<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Benjamin Ryan (@benryanwriter) August 22, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\ud83d\udd3948% reduced number of sex partners
\ud83d\udd3950% reduced one-time sexual encounters
\ud83d\udd3949% reduced sex with partners met on apps or at sex venues.https:\/\/t.co\/pWQRF4xJhg<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/l4ZQCls9zG<\/a><\/p>\n\n