{"id":4830,"date":"2026-03-11T22:40:48","date_gmt":"2026-03-11T22:40:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/11\/modern-american-myths-to-be-very-wary-of-black-blonde-media\/"},"modified":"2026-03-11T22:40:48","modified_gmt":"2026-03-11T22:40:48","slug":"modern-american-myths-to-be-very-wary-of-black-blonde-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/11\/modern-american-myths-to-be-very-wary-of-black-blonde-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Modern American Myths To Be Very Wary Of \u2013 Black & Blonde Media"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

These are in no particular order but there is one constant when dealing with people. There are those who are really good at what they do, and the rest range from mediocre down to piss poor.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s just about how good they are about concealing it.<\/p>\n

<\/a>We\u2019re told we can trust our leaders. Their words affect our daily lives and when repeated by our media, have profound effects on everything from grocery and gas prices to world peace.<\/p>\n

However, there\u2019s a very small number of people in the United States who can lie with near total impugnity. None of us can lie about our boss or to our customers without being promply fired. But if you\u2019re one of the 635 on Capitol Hill (clearly not the best and brightest 635 in America either\u2026.)<\/em>, and as long as you\u2019re on the clock, you can say anything you want about anything or anybody.<\/p>\n

Must be nice\u2026.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>The\u00a0Senators and Representatives shall in all Cases<\/strong>, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace,\u00a0be privileged from Arrest\u00a0<\/strong>during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and\u00a0for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.<\/strong><\/span><\/span>
\u2014<\/span>\u00a0United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1)<\/a><\/p>\n

And they\u2019d NEVER abuse that privilege, right?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u201cIf you like your doctor, you can keep you doctor. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.\u201d<\/span>
\u2014<\/span> President Barack Obama, PolitiFact \u2018Lie of the Year\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n

Obama knew Republicans would be hard pressed and\/or gutless trying to prove \u201chigh crimes and misdemeanors\u201d here as presidents were not included in the Clause, so he just repeated this whopper over three dozen times.<\/p>\n

We had politicians on the floor of the Senate accusing a presidential candidate of not filing income taxes (knowing he did), and after the election one was called on the mistruth to which he responded, \u201cWell, he didn\u2019t win, did he?\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Americans have to live with the daily ramifications of falsehoods spoken and written by House and Senate politicians, echoed by both legacy and social media. Imagine how much better life could be if the elected were required to be honest\u2026.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>There are probably hundreds of instances where women declare men slobs, pigs, etc. Husbands and boyfriends are the butt of such declarations on women\u2019s talk shows, op-ed and social media posts, and are never called on it.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because women know and consciously deflect from an ugly truth: they can be easily outed as mockable projection hypocrites if their behavioral tendencies were exposed and publicly acknowledged.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Go to any department store and look at the women\u2019s clothing and shoe aisles. One will see blouses and dresses strewn on the floor under the hung garments. Women just throw garments anywhere but back on the racks where they found them. Shoes, instead on being put back in place after being tried on, are just left on the floor to be walked around or tripped over.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Laura has also decribed the horrors of using a women\u2019s public restroom.<\/p>\n

Shit, piss and menstraul fluid literally splattered on and around toilet seats, soiled femine hygene products left on the floors or stopping up toilets\u2026 yeah, it\u2019s fuckng gross and the same women who punchline men as slobs will NEVER tell you how disgusting they are behind closed stalls.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>There is this perception that teachers and professors have the last word during any discussion. If one has any doubt, their academic credentials are thrown back in your face in an attempt to shut down any disagreement one may have with their conclusions. But why must we take their conclusion as the final word?<\/p>\n

Because we\u2019ve been trained to accept their word.<\/p>\n

Teachers have the ultimate power, by issuing grades from first grade through college, to certify or destroy an academic record that has profound implications for an employment career. Since their grades are as simple as right or wrong, the implication is they know more than the student which most of the time is correct.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>However in recent years, teachers (who are never given the opportunity to be vetted by parents<\/a>) enter the classroom, not with the mission to educate children with the tools needed to function in society but with personal agendas that may be at odds with the values with parents. But because they are teachers with the power to destroy the academic record of any child, those agendas have been legitimized.<\/p>\n

Parents are given no proof of the proficiency of any teacher but are supposed to accept they are good teachers simply because they\u2019re employed by a school. We have no prior assurance teachers are actual decent people. But again because they are teachers, parents are not allowed to question their competence and sanity even when they repeatedly behave in deviant manners.<\/p>\n

Given the lofty compensation for their emergency services (they\u2019re mostly only hired when bad things happen), one would think lawyers are the ultimate professionals. Cinematic and television portrayals collectively sure give that impression.<\/p>\n

And where\u2019s the proof?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>When looking for a lawyer, you\u2019re presented with a headshot (usually taken when he or she was much younger). You\u2019re to be impressed by the law school attended, their degrees, their years since passing the bar exam<\/a>, and years in a legal area of expertice. But there\u2019s one piece of very important information you won\u2019t see in a lawyer\u2019s bio.<\/p>\n

When a professional sports team is looking for a new coach, the first metric their fans look at are the wins and losses. That\u2019s the easiest way to gauge if that coach candidate is worth consideration. However with lawyers, you will NEVER see the wins and losses of any law firm or individual attorney on any website.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>So how do you know if the hundreds of dollars per hour, or contingency, is going to a good lawyer or a bad one?<\/p>\n

You won\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Ask an attorney for the number of their wins and losses and see what happens. Note the grammar in their response for a quick clue.<\/p>\n

Again because of their level and years of education, we\u2019re told it\u2019s extremely problematic to ever question the conclusion of a medical professional. But doctors and lawyers share one commonality in said professions.<\/p>\n

They don\u2019t perform law or medicine. They \u201cpractice\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
That long-standing word description alone should be pause for concern as the common definition is it\u2019s a \u201cmethod of learning by repetition\u201d. Do you really want someone learning when your finances, freedom, health or life is on the line? Like lawyers, you\u2019re to assume high-priced doctors are good at what they do despite your not given any documentation to back it up.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>How many patients have they cured? How many have sued them for a misdiagnosis or negligence? How many patients have they lost?<\/p>\n

Despite the high compensation demanded for their services, neither offer a guarantee of success.<\/p>\n

If you don\u2019t ask, they won\u2019t tell you. If they do respond, they\u2019ll probably hide behind HIPPA<\/a> so they still won\u2019t tell you.<\/p>\n

Just read the ingredients on any food product you purchase at your market of choice and you\u2019ll be left dumbfounded because, chances are, you can\u2019t even pronounce some of the chemicals added to what we consume on a daily basis.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>It might surprise you to learn that many food additives found in bread, baked goods, and candy manufactured in the United States are banned or restricted in Europe and other parts of the world because of potential health risks. U.S. consumers generally assume that items on grocery store shelves have been vetted for safety, but a loophole in the approval process of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) means that 99 percent of new food chemicals aren\u2019t evaluated before they are added to products.<\/span>
\u2014<\/span> Everyday Heath<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/span>While the excuse may be these chemicals are added for visual and palate aesthetics or preservation, many of these additives have quite negative short and longterm health ramifications. High fructose corn syrup, maltodextrin, monosodium glutamate are some of the most widely used culprits. Funny how when you see drug commercials that reveal those pesky, possible negative side effects (that inconveniently include death), we\u2019re never given similar warnings when it comes to the ingredients added to our food.<\/p>\n

Are they trying to kill us?<\/p>\n

For anyone listening to news reports about the affordability and\/or availability of homes, disregard all the metrics given as there\u2019s one very important factor the media leaves out.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Realtors.<\/p>\n

They set local and regional market prices based on their personal commission demands. They<\/span> are the ones assuring hallucinating sellers how valuable their neglected or damaged homes are. There are more protections for buying a used car than a home purchase worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.<\/p>\n

Why are the homes neglected or damaged? Because some people bought over-their-head and after mortgage, bills, and daily expenses, had little money left, let alone for routine maintenance. When the inevitable happens and repairs are required, handyman cheap appears to be the remedy of choice and shoddy workmanship will be discovered belatedly by subsequent owners.<\/p>\n

If you have the misfortune of searching for a home, there\u2019s one constant: the condition of the homes you\u2019ll see range from tolerable to you-must-be-high. From experience it\u2019s safe to say 98% of the homes you\u2019ll tour are in some way damaged. To a seller and realtor, the buyer is a mark. They want your money and conscience is in very short supply.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Unless you have the wealth to build from ground up you\u2019ll be choosing from poorly maintained, insect and\/or rodent infested, mold and\/or water damaged homes with inflated prices that will help an entitled seller hit the lottery and the greedy realtor receive that generous commission. If that house was initially listed at an realistic price with honest verbal and pictorial descriptions (big IF), it\u2019ll most likely be scooped up quickly by another realtor\/broker who\u2019ll put the minimum into that house and flip it at a hefty markup. It\u2019s the optional ethics of realtors that make home prices unaffordable for most buyers, not to mention the ripple effect of jacking up the property taxes of all those around that home.<\/p>\n

Also be wary of the typical descriptions of houses found online: \u201cmeticulously maintained\u201d, \u201cnestled in\u201d, \u201ccozy\u201d, \u201cspacious\u201d and other glowing adjectives that will be fodder for instant disappointment when you visit the property. Getting honest disclosures from realtors (required by law in some states) about the house is like pulling teeth. You\u2019ll only be told what you know to ask. Then it\u2019s a question of how much potential money you\u2019re willing to tolerate or invest in that house after buying that expensive shack.<\/p>\n

Despite all you\u2019re told, there is no housing shortage.<\/p>\n

There IS a shortage of houses that are worth the asking price.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Speaking of overpriced, there was a time in America if you were to spend a little more money on an item , you were assured of receiving something of higher quality that would last for many, many years.<\/p>\n

Those were the days.<\/p>\n

Cars actually had steel frames and bodies that could withstand a simple bump and could inflict even more damage to whatever it came in contact with. The left saw that as unfair, so all cars were subsequently constructed with lighter materials so damage would be more equitable.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Just look at some of the 60\u2019s era kitchen appliances you can still<\/span> find in homes currently for sale.<\/p>\n

Today, the more you spend on anything, you\u2019ll purchase the inferior in order to get you to repeat that sad cycle. Any product or service you don\u2019t buy often will be used against you. The quality will be questionable at best to assure multiple repeat visits that will never fix the problem. Whether we\u2019re talking about an appliance, store, auto mechanic, finding someone who\u2019s first mission isn\u2019t to rip you off is like seeking the Holy Grail.<\/p>\n

As this appears to be the current business model, not sure when our money will be respected again.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>We\u2019re told to trust the media, and who says that the most?<\/p>\n

The media.<\/p>\n

Without those who consume their product, their overinflated salaries don\u2019t happen. News anchors must come off as authorities on any given topic and when the inevitable happens and they get something very wrong, apologies and retractions are as brief and short as possible. To make matters worse, whether we\u2019re talking about the news or entertainment industries, these people truly believe they are smarter that the American people whose ignorance on any given topic should be solely blamed on\u2026 the media.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Our job is to control what people think.<\/span><\/strong>
\u2014<\/span>\u00a0Mika Brzezinski, 2\/22\/17<\/a><\/p>\n

Note the use of terms used when describing the American people: \u201caverage\u201d, \u201ceveryday\u201d, \u201cordinary\u201d people. Think of the narcissistic arrogance and sense of privilege it takes to constantly look at others in that fashion. It gives too many the license to misinform and\/or manipulate because they believe they know what\u2019s best for the public, and for those they prefer and deem protectable.<\/p>\n

Many of today\u2019s journalists also believe if it\u2019s something they\u2019ve<\/span> never heard of, it never happened. What could go wrong with that thinking?<\/p>\n

Also be wary whenever a journalist cites an \u201cexpert\u201d to justify a conclusion. More times than not like \u201canonymous sources\u201d, those experts are not named and if so, the number is as few as possible. That \u201csource\u201d can also be an academic (see: above), or based on past incidents, can be made up altogether<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Arrogance crosses into the entertainment industry where television and movie celebrities believe they\u2019re deep thinkers and know it all simply because of where they work, not to mention those who work for them who don\u2019t have the guts to risk their employment and tell these entertainers when they\u2019re wrong. As a result, embarrassingly misinformed musings are distributed to the masses.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>It has been brought to my attention that, in my support of Palestine, I have inadvertently re-posted articles, and\/or statements, that have contained misinformation and falsehoods. I am aware how sharing inaccurate content can cause confusion and distress; for this I am deeply sorry. I will certainly endeavour to be more diligent in future to verify anything I share online.<\/span>
\u2014<\/span> Guy Pearce, actor<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cInadvertently\u201d\u2026.<\/p>\n

For the most part, disregard their opinions unless you put them in the parody column.<\/p>\n

When it comes to the world of broadcast sports, on-air pundits could be the worse as too many believe they\u2019re also comedians instead of analysts. Their jokes and segments aren\u2019t funny, and we\u2019re to embrace their condescending belief that eye candy is necessary to keep men interested.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a>
Stop.<\/p>\n

There are other examples of myths that will inevitably come to mind as life continues.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

These are in no particular order but there is one constant when dealing with people. There are those who are really good at what they do, and the rest range from mediocre down to piss poor. It\u2019s just about how good they are about concealing it. We\u2019re told we can trust our leaders. Their words […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4831,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4830","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-conservative-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4830\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4831"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conservative-politics.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}